Elder For Governor

LARRY ELDER RECALL NEWSCOM BALLOT COMMITTEE
Patriot, 

To say Gavin Newsom has failed California is a HUGE understatement.  

Gavin Newsom has...
Destroyed...
Betrayed...
Ruined...
Endangered...
Repressed...
Impoverished California. 

This is why we're fighting to recall Gavin Newsom, and we need your help. 

We can’t begin to save California and restore it to the place where people once again come to achieve the American Dream without FIRST voting YES to recall Newsom. 

Will you join us and help recall Gavin Newsom on September 14th by chipping in $25, $50, $100 or even more today? 

JOIN LARRY ELDER
RECALL GAVIN NEWSOM → 

Under Gavin Newsom, people and businesses are fleeing California in droves. Those who choose to stay face rampant crime & homelessness, a broken education system, high cost of living and high taxes. 

What has happened to California is both heartbreaking and infuriating 

It’s not too late to save our state, but first we need to get rid of the man responsible for its demise. 

Recalling Gavin Newsom is question #1 on the September 14th recall election ballot, and it’s the first step to getting California back on the path to prosperity, opportunity and exceptionalism. 

Will you contribute $25, $50, $100 or even more now to help us rally Californians who are ready to save California and recall failed governor Gavin Newsom? 

Thank you, 

Larry Elder
Recall Newsom
Ballot Committee 

JOIN LARRY ELDER
RECALL GAVIN NEWSOM → 
“Gavin Newsom has failed California. He’s raised our taxes, closed our schools, put millions out of work, killed any number of small businesses, released thousands of criminals into our communities, and allowed the homeless to take over our streets. It’s time to hold Gavin Newsom accountable for the nightmare he’s made of California. Join me in voting YES to recall Gavin Newsom on September 14th.” – LARRY ELDER




PAID FOR BY LARRY ELDER BALLOT MEASURE COMMITTEE RECALL NEWSOM 

Free Cuba Now!

To promote a peaceful transition to a Cuba that respects human rights
and political and economic freedoms

 

Examining the Castro regime's internal blockade on Cubans - how the dictatorship restricts fishermen from fishing.

The Castro dictatorship calls the United States economic embargo a "blockade."  This is not true as the State Department (and U.S. - Cuba trade statistics over the past 20 years) demonstrate. A meme appeared on social media in Spanish that outlines this reality, and Cuban scholar and journalist Carlos Alberto Montaner recently gave a commentary on this. Below is a translation to English of this meme.

"The blockade does not prohibit fishermen in Cuba from fishing, the dictatorship does;
The blockade does not confiscate what farmers harvest, the dictatorship does;

The blockade does not prohibit Cubans on the island from doing business freely, the dictatorship does;

The blockade did not destroy every sugar mill, textile factory, shoe store, canning factory, the dictatorship did;

The blockade is not responsible for Cubans being paid with worthless pesos and stores sell you products with American dollars; the dictatorship is;

The blockade is not responsible that Cubans are beaten and imprisoned for thinking differently, the dictatorship is;

The blockade  is not responsible that there are hundreds of Cuban political prisoners who have not committed any crime, the dictatorship is;

The blockade  is not responsible for sending Cubans US dollars that they give to you in worthless pesos in the Western Union, the dictatorship is;

The blockade  is not responsible for the dictatorship building hotels and the roofs that fall on Cubans' heads, the dictatorship is;

The blockade  is not responsible for  hospitals in Cuba that are disgusting, the dictatorship is;

The blockade  is not responsible for  not having water in homes, for not maintaining the aqueduct system, the dictatorship is;"

The United States does not have a "blockade" on Cuba, but porous economic sanctions with a focus on cutting off funds to the military that controls most of the Cuban economy. What the meme does reveal is that there is an "internal blockade" on Cubans imposed by the Castro dictatorship. Remittances continue to flood Cuba from the exile community in South Florida. What has become vastly more difficult is sending food, and medicine but that is largely due to the regime in Havana.

Afro-Cuban American scholar, Amalia Dache, an associate professor in the Higher Education Division at the University of Pennsylvania who "engages in research within contested urban geographies, including Havana, Cuba; Cape Town, South Africa; and Ferguson, Missouri" explained in July 21, 2021 the reality of the US embargo and the Castro regime's internal blockade.

"No. It’s very hard for me to say that as someone who still has family living in Cuba. But lifting the embargo would not magically improve their lives. Here’s why: To understand the US embargo, it’s important to know about the internal blockade the Cuban government imposes on its own people. For example, the US embargo does still allow for food and medicine sales to Cuba. The Cuban government buys $100 million worth of chicken from producers in the United States annually. It sells that chicken to the Cuban people at a marked-up rate, sometimes at double the cost, and uses the profit to fund the regime. Other countries trade freely with Cuba, but because the government is heavily involved, the internal blockade keeps those profits from reaching the Cuban people. Poor neighborhoods — Afro Cuban neighborhoods — get the worst of the shortages. The police and military get money for new cars and surveillance technology."

The Center for a Free Cuba is highlighting the reality of this embargo by examining each one of the claims above over the next several months. This first one to be examined is the claim that "the blockade does not prohibit fishermen in Cuba from fishing, the dictatorship does."  According to an August 27, 2019 Reuters article " Cubans eat a quarter of the seafood they did at the end of the 1980s, according to official data, and just a fraction of the global average fish consumption per capita, leading them to joke bitterly about being an island without fish.

Journalist and visual storyteller Tracey Eaton in an e-mail sent on July 28, 2021 reported that  "one of the things that inspired José Daniel Ferrer early on was to organize fishermen and fight for their rights. He told me about that when I interviewed him in his home." Jose Daniel mentions it in this video at 6 minutes 8 seconds in which he describes setting up a "clandestine fishing cooperative" to feed families. 

Laws on the books restrict fishing in Cuba by individuals using laws that in practice are onerous and have prevented Cubans from fishing with heavy fines that if they cannot pay means prison.

Real record on pollution

Outside of Cuba and in regime publications the claim is made that the Castro regime is a responsible steward, but like many other claims when closely inspected prove false, and the destruction caused has real impacts on both Cubans and nature.

The Castro regime sells a stolen version of Havana Club, that today"pumps 1,288 cubic meters of waste liquids into the Chipriona inlet in Cuba every day, mostly vinasse (a residual liquid remaining from the fermentation and distillation of alcoholic liquors). It has been doing that since the 1990s, although the problems became more acute starting in 2007," according to Julio Batista in his 2017 report described the impact of this pollution as follows:

"The Chipriona inlet is a place where no one goes, where no one fishes, that doesn't need a fence because no one wants to swim in the boiling filth that flows into its waters every day. The waters of what used to be a beach are now soupy and have the sour smell of decomposition. No studies about the marine life in the inlet are publicly available, but fishermen say there's no fish there." ..."In the last decade, Chipriona has become the drainage point for the Ronera Sana Cruz, the biggest distillery in the country and one of the four owned by Cuba Ron S.A. It's the end point of the sewage of the only place where the white and 3-year-old brands are distilled by Havana Club International (HCI). And the dumping ground for a company that earned $118.5 million in profits in 2016 from the sale of 4.2 million boxes each with nine liters of rum."

Despite the Castro regime's poor record on environmental stewardship and overall terrible record on human rights, the United States in 2016 stripped Bacardi of its right to the Havana Club brand. According to Reuters, "in January, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office decided to allow Cuban state firm Cubaexport to register the Havana Club name once again in the United States." Bacardi "acquired the rights to the Havana Club trademark from its pre-revolutionary owner whose distillery was nationalized" by the communist regime.

Although Cuban laws prohibit these kinds of practices, the distillery's untreated wastes wind up in the ocean. (It is a regime facility.) Photo Jullio Batista.

Ambassador Otto J. Reich, president of the Center for a Free Cuba, on January 31, 2020 in The Miami Herald called on the United States to undo this wrong that continues to favor the Castro dictatorship and gutted the rights of a Cuban family business. "The Obama administration allowed Cuba to renew an expired trademark registration for the confiscated Havana Club rum. The Trump administration should reverse that action and demonstrate to unscrupulous foreign companies that there are grave risks to economic deals with a regime that has stolen billions of dollars in properties from Americans and Cubans, and thus stop dishonestly enriching the Cuban government."

This action by the United States in 2016 against Bacardi, and in favor of the Castro dictatorship was a deeply unpopular move for Cubans with a sense of history. Business Insider on October 28, 2020 broadcast a podcast on "Bacardi and the Long Fight for Cuba" that explored the company's history back to Cuba's colonial period under Spain in the 1870s.

Regime fishing fleet overfished Cuban waters for export and Cubans have been heavily fined for fishing without a license, and if not paid they face prison. The following open letter is being circulated. Correspondents on the island will not report on what has damaged fishing because it would earn them a rapid expulsion from Cuba by regime authorities, but independent Cuban journalists, who risk prison, have reported the situation on the ground.

Let Cubans Fish

It is encouraging that President Miguel Diaz Canel has listened to the pleas of the Christian Liberation Movement, the Ladies in White, the Patriotic Union of Cuba, Cuba Decide, and the San Isidro Movement and others that for over a year called on Havana to lift limits and tariffs on food, medicine, and hygiene items brought to Cuba. Prime Minister Manuel Marrero  announced on  July  14th they would temporarily be lifted until December 31, 2021 following the July 11, 2021 Cuban cry for help, freedom, and an end to the dictatorship.
 
We are pleading with your excellency for an additional concession. This is a time of great suffering. We ask you to intercede with President Diaz Canel and General Raul Castro. to urge all restrictions on fishing by Cuban citizens be immediately lifted.
 
Cuba is an island surrounded by a bountiful sea. The most common fish are snapper, grouper, and mahi mahi. For many years most Cubans have been unable to eat these ubiquitous fish. The reason for the absence of these fish in the diets of most Cubans is the same reason for general food shortages: the policies of the Cuban government.
 
Cuba’s central military- communist governing entities authorize only regime-profiting fisheries to deliver fish from its territorial island waters to its state-run and/or state partnered restaurants and hotels. Those not authorized by the regime cannot fish. There are restrictions in place limiting Cubans from fishing both in fresh and saltwater. A Cuban who tries to sell fish, shrimp, or lobster is fined or sent to prison if he is not authorized to fish by the government, which takes all fish for state-sanctioned purposes.
 
We urge governments with diplomatic relations, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations to immediately send observers on how to come to the aid of Cuban families, and to let Cubans fish. That an island nation’s people are unable to feed their families with fish from the seas around them is beyond comprehension.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Prominent Cubans

7/29/2021
 
A publication of the Cuban Studies Institute
“Prominent Cubans” is a new series of weekly publications highlighting the principal political, economic, social and cultural leaders during Cuba’s late colonial and national period.
 
We hope you enjoy this new publication. 
 
Following is the 30th in this new series.
 
 
PROMINENT CUBANS
 
 Ramiro Guerra y Sánchez (1880-1970)
 
Intellectual, historian and political adviser to President Gerardo Machado.  He influenced post-independence Cuba as director of the Escuela Normal de la Habana, as superintendent of schools, and through his writings, generally critical of US policies toward Cuba.  His main books are “Historia de CubaLa Lección de la escuela primariaLa Patria en la escuelaEl Padre VarelaEcuadorAzúcar y población en las Antillas, El Cardenal Cisneros y el principio de autoridadFines de la educación nacionalLa Expansión territorial de los Estados Unidos a expensas de España y de los países hispanoamericanos, and Guerra de los diez años, 1868-78.

 
Read on Web
This is a publication of the Cuban Studies Institute. 

Our mailing address is:
1500 South Dixie Highway, Bank of America Bldg., 2nd Floor
Coral Gables, FL  33146
Tel: 786-803-8007
Fax: 786-803-8068
Email: cubanstudies@cubanstudiesinstitute.com

ACT

ACT For America

 
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube MeWeRumble


The Antifa/FBI Coalition 


 

By John Dietrich
America Thinker


 

Over two dozen people were killed during the Antifa and BLM protests in 2020.  It is routinely reported that "five people died as a result" of the Jan. 6 disturbance.  This is a totally accurate statement, however, it is still misleading.  Only one of the deceased died as a result of violence.  She was actually murdered by a government official. Relating these deaths allows the media to routinely describe Jan. 6 as a "deadly insurrection" as opposed to the "mostly peaceful" protests by Antifa and BLM.  

Prior to Jan. 6, Trump supporters had held dozens of mass rallies without burning cities or murdering people.  This was a major embarrassment for the Deep State.  Media coverage of the Jan. 6 event has been largely successful in minimizing that embarrassment.  This was a major Deep State coup and the planning and execution of this "insurrection" reveal a disturbing relationship between the government and radical groups. The FBI did not only fail to adequately prevent the disturbance, they appear to have actively facilitated it. The FBI and radical leftists are branches of the Deep State.

 

FBI Take a Knee


The FBI has a history of instigating terrorist plots that they thwart with great fanfare. This is not a conspiracy theory. 

The New York Times has reported there have been twenty terrorist plots against the U.S.  Three of those plots were real; the other 17 were created — and then stopped — by the FBI.  

The Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping case is based on evidence provided by two FBI informants and two undercover agents according to the FBI’s affidavit.  

As many as twelve informants were used in this case.  Enrique Tarrio, leader of the Proud Boys, was at one time an FBI informant.  Several sizable right-wing organizations were involved in the Jan. 6 disturbance.  The FBI had infiltrated every one of them and therefore knew exactly what they had planned. 


The DC Metropolitan Police also had at least one undercover employee embedded within the pro-Trump crowd.  This is not speculation.  It is based on court records.  

It is preposterous to contend that the FBI did not have operatives in this disturbance as Christopher Wray contends.   Journalist Glenn Greenwald commented, “What would be shocking and strange is not if the FBI had embedded informants and other infiltrators in the groups planning the January 6 Capitol riot.  What would be shocking and strange—bizarre and inexplicable—is if the FBI did not have those groups under tight control.”


The FBI and the Capitol Police knew in advance that the demonstration would turn violent. 


The New York Times reported: 

"The Capitol Police had clearer advance warnings about the Jan. 6 attack than were previously known, including the potential for violence in which “Congress itself is the target.” But officers were instructed by their leaders not to use their most aggressive tactics to hold off the mob, according to a scathing new report by the agency’s internal investigator."


Yet the head of the FBI’s Washington Field Office, Steven D’Antuono, told reporters that the agency did not have any intelligence suggesting the Trump rally would not be peaceful.  
 

During Senate testimony, Senator Amy Klobuchar suggested that the FBI had not infiltrated these groups.  She asked Christopher Wray, "There must be moments where you think if we would have known, if we could have infiltrated this group or found out what they were doing, and that -- you have those moments?"  Wray did not correct her.  The knowledge that there would be violence was based partially on a document acquired by the Norfolk FBI.  

It asserted, "Be ready to fight. Congress needs to hear glass breaking, doors being kicked in, and blood from their BLM and Pantifa slave soldiers being spilled. Get violent. Stop calling this a march, or rally, or a protest. Go there ready for war. We get our President or we die. NOTHING else will achieve this goal.”  


The FBI does not reveal the source of this document.  Was it really the work of a Trump supporter?  Still, the violence could have been prevented. 
 

According to Kash Patel, Chief of Staff to Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller, "We had offered the Capitol Police, and Mayor Bowser of Washington, D.C., thousands of National Guardsmen and women, two days before Jan. 6. And they turned us down."
 

Defenders of left-wing radical groups stress the fact that they are "decentralized."  Wikipedia's description of Antifa mentions its "decentralized" nature numerous times.  Yet, the left is capable of acting in unison, as if under the command of a single director.  Mike Podhorzer, senior adviser to the president of the AFL-CIO, is mentioned in a Time magazine article giving a reason why left-wing groups were not visible on Jan. 6. He credits the activists for their restraint: “They had spent so much time getting ready to hit the streets on Wednesday. But they did it.  

Wednesday through Friday, there was not a single Antifa vs. Proud Boys incident like everyone was expecting. And when that didn’t materialize, I don’t think the Trump campaign had a backup plan.”  Podhorzer continued, "To preserve safety and ensure they couldn’t be blamed for any mayhem, the activist left was 'strenuously discouraging counter activity.'” All these "independent" groups decided in unison to stay home that day.  Or did they?

 

Antifa activist John Sullivan's brother James claims that there were 265 disguised Antifa members at the disturbance.  The FBI will investigate this just as they are investigating child sex crimes.  (Unfortunately, David Harris, who was in charge of investigating crimes against children, was arrested for numerous child sex crimes.)
 

Part of the reason for the feds not releasing the government videos is that there are literally tens of thousands of researchers who plan on viewing the tapes. They may reveal FBI informants taking part in the violence.  The left has an extensive network of training facilities for agents provocateurs.  
 

Scott Foval, former National Field Director at Americans United for Change claimed, “We have to have people prepared to go wherever these events are, which means we have to have a central kind of agitator training."  He continued, “I’m saying we have mentally ill people that we pay to do sh—, make no mistake.”  Robert Creamer, founder of Democracy Advocates and husband of Rep. Janice D. Schakowsky, stated, “Wherever Trump and Pence are going to be, we have events, we have a whole team across the country that does that."


According to Rep. James Comer, the Republican leader of the U.S. House Oversight Committee, protestors are kept in deplorable conditions.  Yet, John Sullivan, who is recorded on tape saying “Let’s burn this shit down” was released without bail and placed on house arrest.  Many of the "unindicted co-conspirators" appear to have been more violent than those placed in solitary confinement.  This is possibly why the Department of Justice refuses to release to the public over 14,000 hours of video taken at the Capitol during the “insurrection.” 

Selected clips are presented in court as evidence against Jan. 6 defendants.  Capitol Police argue that making all the tapes available to defense attorneys —let alone to the American public—could provoke future violence.

 

 

DONATE

Copyright © 2021. ACT for America,
1300 Pennsylvania Ave. Suite 190, #614
Washington, DC 20004
United States
https://www.actforamerica.org