One man challenges Sharia law.

Voice of the Copts, a nonprofit organization, fights the spread of Islamic supremacy and Sharia throughout the Western world through education, advocacy and action. By drawing attention to the suffering of Coptic Christians in Egypt, it endeavors to educate the Western world as to the chilling effect of Sharia (Islamic law). Founded in 2007 by Dr. Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts focuses on three key issues: freedom of religion, cultural identity and women’s rights.



Egypt’s “deviant” atheism is Islam’s worst insult: One man challenges Sharia law.


By Dr. Ashraf Ramelah

While Islamic terror no longer dominates the nightly news around the world as it had a decade ago, Egyptian authorities continue to rely on Egypt’s Second Amendment to terrorize its citizens. According to the constitution, Islamic Sharia Law is the final word. Their target is everyone who expresses antithetical doctrine to Islam, not just Christians. Muslims who are outspoken and waver from orthodoxy in any way pay the price of personal freedom. It is commonplace for authorities to surveil and arrest nonconformists, especially those who profess atheism. Atheism is forbidden by the state and condemned as “deviant.” The Egyptian system is well documented for crushing free expression and penalizing religious freedom.  

In 2023, Sherif Gaber, a thirty-one-year-old influencer on social media, a political activist and creator of religiously irreverent YouTube videos, went a step farther. He referred to academic and scientific evidence to defend homosexuality to his university psychology professor who considered the lifestyle a pathological condition. As a result of Gaber’s fierce defense of that lifestyle, some students and professors signed a petition addressed to the university dean accusing Gaber of atheism. 

This petition included posts and videos Gaber published on social media. Gaber became known among his colleagues as a spreader of atheistic ideas. In fact, he began a Facebook page called Atheists and denied the existence of heaven and hell. Gaber openly expressed his beliefs, and in the eyes of the state he became a provocateur, and a complaint was filed against him at the university this same year.

 it all began 10 years earlier for Gaber 

This was nothing new for Gaber. His controversial videos contradicting Islam and encouraging atheism on social media as far back as 2013 brought him his first arrest and prison sentence of three years issued by the Ismailia Misdemeanor Court. Immediately after serving his sentence, he was again arrested in 2015 and sentenced to one year in prison which was reduced to a fine after his appeal. In May 2018, he was arrested for a third time on charges of mocking Allah and the Islamic religion, however, he was pardoned and released.

 After his release in 2019, Gaber appealed to the public, “Help me escape from Egypt.” Through his YouTube channel he requested donations to enable him to leave Egypt and request another citizenship. He announced that he was in hiding for fear of retaliation from religious fanatics -- a familiar reality for Egyptian Christians who are pursued by Islamic revenge seekers.

 In 2021, the State of Commissioners Authority of the Supreme Council for Media Regulation, a government body overseeing non-state social media and non-government news media, issued a report stating that the government filed a lawsuit against Gaber, demanding the deletion of his YouTube channel and all his electronic links. Unlike YouTube’s censorship in the United States where free speech is shut down on the whim of YouTube’s obscure policies and channels expunged in the blink of an eye, YouTube of Egypt took no such initiative, allowing Gaber to transmit his illegal atheist and pro-homosexuality content in the progressive style of the West.

 This meant that the omniscient Egyptian state either turned a blind eye toward YouTube permitting Gaber’s channel or was complicit with YouTube by design so that Gaber and his unholy ideas would be exposed and publicly censured. The State of Commissioners Authority mandates in its bylaws that all media is “to strike with an iron fist anyone who dared to disdain a heavenly religion [although, in all practicality the mandate never applies to Christianity and Judaism], insult one of the messengers or prophets, or attack the divine essence with any kind of expression that carries sarcasm, mockery, or belittlement.”

In addition, the report stated:

 “There is no doubt that the deviant atheist ideas broadcast by the so-called person [Gaber] would undermine the noble objectives of Islamic law that protects Egyptian society from temptations and unrest and protects its religious beliefs and principles. This is something that takes precedence over any other material consideration. If the state violates this obligation, it will have violated its most important duties towards its people, and deciding to block Gaber must be the first step to stop him, deter him, and prevent him from spreading his deviant ideas among our sons and daughters.” 

Gaber is currently serving a five-year prison sentence issued in 2023 

 Although Gaber had had the 2021 lawsuit pending, an Egyptian Attorney, Al-Haytham Saad, independently filed a lawsuit against Gaber in September of 2023 accusing him of insulting Allah and mocking the Islamic religion. Saad exploited Gaber’s battle for rights to gain publicity for himself as is often the case in Egypt and Islam where anyone can come to the defense of Allah and the Prophet. His filing led to Gaber’s arrest, who was found guilty by the Egyptian court and sentenced to prison for five years.

 Although undermining Christianity is freely permitted in Egypt, it is forbidden to criticize Islam. The state religion is protected by law, which even includes preventing public confrontations and debates by clerics attempting to prove the correctness of the Islamic books. Any inquisitiveness lands an average citizen in jail. Gaber is just that. However, his courage, endurance and resilience in challenging the state’s limitations of speech and expression as no other individual has done in Egypt makes him special and places him among the most heroic of names in the list of human rights warriors.

 At this point, President Al-Sisi alone has the power to overrule Gaber’s sentence and show mercy, moreover, show that he is as he stated himself to be upon his election, “the protector of free speech and democracy.” However, at this time, Gaber would be set free only to be silent. Naturally in doing so, Al Sisi would be defying the Sharia and the powerful thought police of Al-Ahzar Institute, the pre-eminent keeper and interpreter of Islamic law for the whole of the Arab-Muslim world.

 Consequently, Al-Sisi would surely be denounced publicly by the Al-Ahzar clerics and scholars for his disobedience to Koranic teachings. Subsequently, the Muslim Brotherhood, that already opposes him, would eagerly join in to accuse him and instigate naïve Muslim-Egyptians to rise and protest the president in the streets. When Al-Sisi does not speak up in favor of Gaber on behalf of free expression in Egypt, Gaber becomes an example by the state of what happens when an Egyptian becomes an “infidel” for western values.     

 Egypt’s government control and archaic practices have not gone unnoticed by the rest of the world. For example, the ranking system of NomadCapitalist.com has calculated Egypt’s Perception score to be 20 out of 50, meaning that “Egypt citizens experience intermediate hostility.” Nomad rates “government surveillance, press freedom and other factors to determine the personal freedom of citizens…with scores from 10 being the least free to 50 being the freest.” Nomad assigned Egypt a Freedom score of 20, meaning that “Egypt citizens have low freedom.” Nomad’s client base is forewarned about what to expect from Egypt when planning foreign investments, second homes and passports.


Dr. Ashraf Ramelah is the founder and president of Voice of the Copts, a human rights nonprofit organization 501 (c) (3). The organization has offices in Italy and the United States.

Dr. Ramelah is dedicated to the Coptic cause and believes that his life’s mission is to speak up for the oppressed Copts who cannot speak up for themselves.

Dr. Ramelah is well known to the Egyptian government due to his advocacy for the Egyptian Copts as well as for Voice of the Copts’ lawsuit against them on behalf of Muslim convert to Christianity Mr. Hegazy and his family in 2009-2010. Ashraf Ramelah also appears as an entry in the Coptic History Encyclopedia (http://www.coptichistory.org/new_page_5260.htm).

Dr. Ramelah, himself a Copt, was born in Cairo, Egypt. At the age of 17, he travelled to Italy to study architecture. He graduated with a doctorate in architecture from La Sapienza – Universita’ Degli Studi di Roma,Italy. His special study is restoration of old monuments and history of architecture.

His career as an architect took him to work and live in Italy, Saudi Arabia, Gabon and the USA. His personal interests are Egyptology and Coptic history in the period after the Arab invasion of Egypt in 651 AD.

Voice of the Copts is dedicated to bringing fair, correct and balanced information to the entire world regarding Copts and Christians in countries with an Arab-Muslim majority.


 

La Casa Futura: Achieving independence for Egyptian youths in the freedom of the West

Rome, Italy. -– a Voice of the Copts’ project

La Casa Futura assists refugee youths fleeing from Egypt due to religious persecution. La Casa Futura is a two-year assimilation program in a residence building for young men and women (ages 15-20 years old) coming from Italian refugee camps. Language classes, vocational training and assistance for legal status in Italy are provided.

Read More


Education

The Media: An Unreliable Narrator

the AZEL

PERSPECTIVE

Commentary on Cuba's Future, U.S. Foreign Policy & Individual Freedoms - Issue 397 B
 
José Azel's latest books "On Freedom" and "Sobre La Libertad" are now available on Amazon. 

The Media: An Unreliable Narrator (Previously published)

ShareShare
TweetTweet
ForwardForward

As every meticulous writer knows, an “unreliable narrator” is a term first coined by literary critic Wayne C. Booth to identify a literary character who tells a story with a lack of credibility; Don Quixote and Forest Gump are well-known examples of unreliable narrators.

Booth distinguishes between reliable and unreliable narrators on the grounds of whether the narrator's speech violates or conforms with general norms and values.  Sometimes the narrator's unreliability is made immediately evident to the reader. However, a more dramatic use of an unreliable narrator delays his revelation until near the end of the story. In some cases, the unreliability of the narrator is never entirely revealed. This leaves the reader to wonder if the narrator should be trusted and how his tale should be interpreted. 
 
In our everyday lives, we have come to think of politicians and others as unreliable narrators. However, until recent times, we looked to the media, particularly newspapers and newscasters, as our most reliable narrators of newsworthy events. Not long ago, broadcast journalists such as Edward Murrow and Walter Cronkite were often named as the most trusted men in America for their honesty and integrity in delivering the news. Viewers thought of Murrow and Cronkite as trusted members of their families. I cannot think of any parallels to our news reporting today. The media have become an unreliable narrator. 
 
It is tempting to simply claim that today we live in a more complex world, but Murrow and Cronkite reported reliably on a world at war,McCarthyism, Vietnam, Watergate, and the turbulent 60s and 70s.

Today, we find that journalists and news producers exhibit their biases in fundamental ways by (1) their coverage - when issues are more or less visible in the news they report (2) by gatekeeping - when stores are selected or deselected on ideological grounds, and (3) by their tonality or presentation bias - when coverage is slanted towards or against particular actors or issues.
 
Gatekeeping bias is particularly difficult to identify because it requires us to know the full scope of news from which journalists and editors select the stories to be published. Yet, several studies show that a dominant majority of journalists identify as liberals/Democrats.
 
In 2014, media communications researcher, Jim A. Kuypers published Partisan Journalism: A History of Media Bias in the United States.This 40-year study of the political beliefs and commentary of American journalists found that print and broadcast journalists were considerably to the political left of the majority of Americans and that these political beliefs were reflected in their news stories.  The web site www.allsides.com offers media bias ratings for over 800 sources on a scale of Left, Lean Left, Center, Lean Right, Right, and Mixed. For the interested reader, The Miami Herald is rated Lean Left by this outfit, but I could not find an independent rating for El Nuevo Herald.
 
According to a 2017 Gallup poll, our perceptions of news media bias, have increased significantly over the past generation. In 1958, 58 percent of Americans believed that the news media carefully separated fact from opinion. The recent poll data reveals that only 32 percent now hold that opinion. Moreover, whereas in the past 42 percent thought that most news media do not do a good job letting people know what fact is and what is opinion, this view is now up to 66 percent. On a partisan basis the poll shows that 64 percent of Americans believe the media favors the Democratic Party, and only 22 percent said that the media favors the Republican Party.
 
These findings are troubling because unbiased media coverage is vital for a healthy democracy. Democracy relies on a well-informed citizenry. The media needs to regain its role as a reliable narrator. Opinion writers are not exempt. Even within these opinion pages, we have a responsibility to be reliable narrators by making our biases clear to the reader and grounding our opinions. I will try my best.

Please let us know if you Like Issue 397 B - The Media: An Unreliable Narrator on Facebook this article.
We welcome your feedback.
Abrazos,

Lily & José

(click on the name to email Lily or Jose)
José Azel, Ph.D.

José Azel left Cuba in 1961 as a 13 year-old political exile in what has been dubbed Operation Pedro Pan - the largest unaccompanied child refugee movement in the history of the Western Hemisphere.  

He is currently dedicated to the in-depth analyses of Cuba's economic, social and political state, with a keen interest in post-Castro-Cuba strategies. Dr. Azel was a Senior Scholar at the Institute for Cuban and Cuban-American Studies (ICCAS) at the University of Miami, Jose Azel has published extensively on Cuba related topics.

In 2012 and 2015, Dr. Azel testified in the U.S. Congress on U.S.-Cuba Policy, and U.S. National Security.  He is a frequent speaker and commentator on these and related topics on local, national and international media.  He holds undergraduate and masters degrees in business administration and a Ph.D. in International Affairs from the University of Miami.

José along with his wife Lily are avid skiers and adventure travelers.  In recent years they have climbed Grand Teton in Wyoming, trekked Mt. Kilimanjaro in Tanzania and Machu Pichu in Peru.  They have also hiked in Tibet and in the Himalayas to Mt. Everest Base Camp.

They cycled St. James Way (
El Camino de Santiago de Compostela) and cycled alongside the Danube from Germany to Hungary and throughout southern France.  They have scuba dived in the Bay Islands off the Honduran coast and in the Galapagos Islands. Most recently, they rafted for 17 days 220 miles in the Grand Canyon. 

Their adventurers are normally dedicated to raise funds for causes that are dear to them. 

Watch Joe & Lily summit Kilimanjaro.

Books by Dr. José Azel
José Azel’s writings are touched with the wisdom of a master, and the charm of an excellent communicator. Anyone who wishes to understand why countries do, or do not, progress will find in this book the best explanations. And, from these readings emerge numerous inferences: How and why do the good intentions of leftist collectivism lead countries to hell? Why is liberty not a sub product of prosperity, but rather one of its causes?

If it was in my power, this work would be required reading for all college and university students, and I would also recommend its reading to all politicians, journalists, and policymakers. With his writings Azel accomplishes what was achieved in France by Frédéric Bastiat, and in the United States by Henry Hazlitt: Azel brings together common sense with intelligent observation, and academic substance. Stupendous,

Carlos Alberto Montaner
                                                                   BUY NOW
Los escritos de José Azel están tocados por la sabiduría de un maestro y la amenidad de un excelente comunicador. Cualquiera que desee entender por qué los países progresan, o no, encontrará en este libro las mejores explicaciones. De estas lecturas surgen numerosas inferencias: ¿Cómo y por qué las buenas intenciones del colectivismo de izquierda llevan a los países al infierno? ¿Por qué la libertad no es un subproducto de la prosperidad, sino una de sus causas?

Si estuviera en mis manos, esta obra sería de obligada lectura de todos los estudiantes universitarios, pero además, le recomendaría su lectura a todos los políticos, periodistas y policy makers. Con sus escritos Azel logra lo que Frédéric Bastiat consiguiera en Francia y Henry Hazlitt en Estados Unidos: aunar el sentido común, la observación inteligente y la enjundia académica. Estupendo.

Carlos Alberto Montaner
                                                           Compre Aqui
"Liberty for beginners is much more than what the title promises. It is eighty themes touched with the wisdom of a master, and the charm of an excellent communicator. Anyone that wishes to understand why countries do, or do not progress, will find in this book the best explanations. Stupendous"

Carlos Alberto Montaner

"Libertad para novatos es mucho más de lo que promete el título. Son ochenta temas tocados con la sabiduría de un maestro y la amenidad de un excelente comunicador. Cualquier adulto que desee saber por qué progresan o se estancan los pueblos aquí encontrará las mejores explicaciones. Estupendo."

Carlos Alberto Montaner

Compre Aqui

In Reflections on FreedomJosé Azel brings together a collection of his columns published in prestigious newspapers.  Each article reveals his heartfelt and personal awareness of the importance of freedom in our lives.  They are his reflections after nearly sixty years of living and learning as a Cuban outside Cuba. In what has become his stylistic trademark, Professor Azel brilliantly introduces complex topics in brief journalistic articles.
En Reflexiones sobre la libertad José Azel reúne una colección de sus columnas publicadas en prestigiosos periódicos. Cada artículo revela su percepción sincera y personal de la importancia de la libertad en nuestras vidas. Son sus reflexiones después de casi sesenta años viviendo y aprendiendo como cubano fuera de Cuba.  En lo que ha resultado ser característica distintiva de sus artículos, el Profesor Azel introduce con brillantez complejos temas en  breves artículos de carácter periodístico.
Mañana in Cuba is a comprehensive analysis of contemporary Cuba with an incisive perspective of the Cuban frame of mind and its relevancy for Cuba's future.
Pedazos y Vacíos is a collection of poems written in by Dr. Azel in his youth. Poems are in Spanish.
To friend, follow or email author click on the icons below:
Facebook
Twitter
Email

Swift Justice

The free world should train their armies to deal with these islamic monsters with the same swift justice they have imposed upon the innocent christian babies and adult hostages, they have beheaded… E.E.R.C.



Justice for Orlando Zapata Tamayo and Brothers to the Rescue members martyred by Communist Cuba for defending human rights

Justice for Orlando Zapata Tamayo and Brothers to the Rescue members martyred by Communist Cuba for defending human rights
 
 
 

Fifteen years ago on February 23, 2010 Cuban human rights defender and prisoner of conscience Orlando Zapata Tamayo was killed while on hunger strike, after being denied water on and off by prison authorities for 18 days causing his kidneys to shut down.

Orlando Zapata had worked on human rights campaigns with Medal of Freedom laureate Dr. Oscar Elías Biscet and gathered signatures with Oswaldo Payá Sardiñas for the Varela Project petition. Oswaldo Payá, together with youth leader Harold Cepero, were killed extrajudicially on July 22, 2012 by agents of Cuba’s Communist government, revealed the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in their June 2023 report on the merits.

Orlando, through his hunger strike, sought to draw attention to the harsh treatment of Cuban prisoners and the imprisonment of nonviolent dissidents. Tamayo’s death marked the end of his immediate campaign, but his nonviolent action sparked significant support for his cause both inside and outside of Cuba after his passing.
 
International attention at the time had focused on the plight of a group of 75 Cuban prisoners of conscience, and by March 2011 the last of them, José Daniel Ferrer and Félix Navarro, had been freed.  Their freedom, in part, is credited to Orlando Zapata Tamayo’s hunger strike, and the international it brought to the plight of political prisoners in Cuba.
 

Currently, there are over 1,000 political prisoners in Cuba, and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has not been able to see any of them. The last time the ICRC was able to visit Cuban prisons, and meet political prisoners was in 1989.

Yoleisy Oviedo Rodríguez

Prison conditions have not improved over the past 15 years in Cuba. Political prisoner Yoleisy Oviedo Rodríguez (age 44) died on February 11, 2025 at the El Guatao Forced Labor Camp in Havana. She was a mother of two children. Yoielsy had been sentenced to five years in prison on November 20, 2023, but had already been jailed since nonviolently on October 10, 2022 protesting prolonged power outages in the municipality of Güines in Mayabeque province.

Twenty nine years ago, on February 24, 1996 Armando Alejandre Jr. (45 years old), Carlos Alberto Costa (29), Mario Manuel de la Peña (24), and Pablo Morales (29) were in two planes engaged in a search and rescue flight for rafters when they were blown out of the sky by missiles launched from a Cuban MiG following Raul Castro’s orders. International investigations concluded that the civilian planes were shot down in international airspace in violation of international norms.This was a premeditated act of state terrorism by the Cuban regime.

On Sunday, February 23 at 3:00pm, the time Orlando Zapata Tamayo died, there will be a vigil at the Casa del Preso  located at 1140 SW 13th Ave, Miami, FL 33135 in remembrance of the Cuban hunger striker.

On Monday, February 24, at 3:15pm friends and families of Armando Alejandre Jr., Carlos Alberto Costa, Mario Manuel de la Peña, and Pablo Morales, and members of the FIU community will gather and hold a vigil to remember them and silently demand justice 29 years after the shoot down. The vigil will take place at Florida International University ( University Park campus) located at 11200 SW 8th St, Miami, FL 33199 at the main fountain next to the Main Library and Student Union. The silent vigil take place start at 3:21pm and end at 3:27pm, the times the two Brothers to the Rescue planes were destroyed by missiles launched from Castro’s MiGs killing Armando, Carlos, Mario, and Pablo. This vigil has been taking place at FIU annually since 1996.