Free Cuba Now!

Systemic corruption exposed at the United Nations (The inmates are running the asylum). The case for nonviolent struggle and sanctions.

 
 

If you want to understand the crisis at the United Nations then one should examine more closely the “Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of the unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human rights”, and place it in the larger international context. According to UN Watch, the Geneva based watchdog organization that seeks to hold the United Nations accountable to its founding principles, “the original sponsor of this Orwellian UN mandate—creating the post of a UN Rapporteur on why sanctions on dictatorships are illegal “unilateral coercive measures”—was the Islamic Regime in Iran, on behalf of the NAM. Resolution 27/21 of September 2014.”

Earlier today on X, UN Watch’s executive director Hillel Neuer reportedNo Joke: The UN next week will hold its first “International Day against Unilateral Coercive Measures” — declaring all Western sanctions against Iran, Russia, North Korea and other tyrannies as a violation of international law. Those who initiated this include China, Cuba and Iran.” He provided a copy of the official document below.

The inmates are running the asylum, and U.S. taxpayers are picking up 25% of the total tab.

Consider the following.

The Special Rapporteur that defends dictatorships

Special Rapporteur Ms. Alena Douhan, an academic from Belarus, described by human rights defenders as “a Maduro propagandist” visited Cuba from November 11 – 21, 2025, and repeated Cuban government talking points.

Ms. Douhan failed to mention that Cuba’s kleptocratic military junta, with billions of dollars in cash reserves, pleads poverty while Cubans living in extreme poverty die due to a lack of lifesaving medications. Meanwhile, regime elites live the good life, visiting Europe and the United States. Nor did she mention that official document leaks indicate that through its military conglomerate GAESA, Havana’s military has $18 billion in bank accounts, more than the foreign reserves of Costa Rica, Uruguay and Panama.

This is not surprising she has also done this in previous visits to Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Zimbabwe, and China where she embraced those regimes. In the case of China she claimed that the Peoples Republic of China is a victim of “illegal” Western sanctions, and Ms. Douhan remained silent on the genocide of the Uyghurs.

The Special Rapporteur received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Peoples Republic of China then proceeded to repeat Beijing’s false narrative drawing the condemnation of Uyghur American Activist Rushan Abbas in 2024.

The United Nations Human Rights Council is supposed to be “responsible for strengthening the promotion and protection of human rights around the globe, and for addressing and taking action on human rights violations around the globe,” but in practice the Council on too many occasions has turned into a body to protect rights violators. On March 18, 2021 a CubaBrief explored the problematic origins of the UN Human Rights Council in 2006, but a 2021 outrage by this human rights body requires additional comment.

On March 23, 2021 the UN Human Rights Council passed a resolutionwith 30 votes in favor, 15 votes against and 2 abstentions that calls on countries to not “use or encourage the use of any type of measure, including but not limited to economic or political measures, to coerce another State in order to obtain from it the subordination of the exercise of its sovereign rights.” The 15 countries that voted against it were Austria, Brazil, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Marshall Islands, Netherlands, Poland, Republic of Korea, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The countries that voted for it included Russia, Bangladesh, China, Cuba, Eritrea, Mauritania, Venezuela Sudan, Pakistan, and Libya. It is a who’s who of the worse human rights violators in the world.

Andres Oppenheimer, writing in the Miami Herald reported that “hours after the Council’s resolution, Cuba’s foreign minister Bruno Rodriguez applauded the vote, and Venezuela’s Foreign Minister Jorge Arreaza tweeted that for ‘basic ethical reasons, the countries that voted against (the resolution) should lose their seats at the Council.’”

Oppenheimer was wrong when he said in 2021 to not pay attention to the resolution that the dictatorships in Venezuela and Cuba were calling a victory, because this is an alternative international system that is being brought into existence out of the old one established in 1948, and hostile to the values and principles found in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Ignore this at your peril.

This resolution and the mandate behind it (the Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of the unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human rights)backed by Cuba’s dictatorship, has consequences that empowers dictators and bad actors the world over. The Special Rapporteur from (2015-19), former Algerian ambassador Idriss Jazairy presented a report in 2017 slamming the United States and the European Union “for imposing sanctions on Russia”, which the U.N. human rights council investigator said amounted to “unilateral coercive measures.” This was compounded by the corruption exposed by UN Watch that Ambassador Idriss Jazairy, had received $50,000 from Russia in 2016 “for his mandate, as disclosed in a recent UN report.”

Sanctions are a nonviolent tool to defend human rights, and hold dictatorships accountable

Dictatorships and bad actors on the international stage are working to strip civil society and democracies of the tools to nonviolently defeat them. They fear and despise the legacy of Gene Sharp (1928 – 2018) founder of the Albert Einstein Institution, and a theoretician of nonviolent action who in 1990 at the National Conference on Nonviolent Sanctions and Defense in Boston, made the case for nonviolent struggle:

“I say nonviolent struggle is armed struggle. And we have to take back that term from those advocates of violence who seek to justify with pretty words that kind of combat. Only with this type of struggle one fights with psychological weapons, social weapons, economic weapons and political weapons. And that this is ultimately more powerful against oppression, injustice and tyranny than violence.”

According to Professor Sharp in his 2013 book HOW NONVIOLENT STRUGGLE WORKS (available online) , third parties on the international scene, including countries, can play a supplementary and complementary role but are never leading the struggle.

“Third-party actions may include protests, public declarations, demonstrations, diplomatic actions, economic sanctions, and the like. They ought to be seen as supplementary and complementary, but never as the main actions of the struggle. The proportion of successes among past cases of international nonviolent action, especially by third parties, is extremely small. The actions have been generally symbolic, and more substantial types, as economic sanctions, have not been applied on the systematic and sustained basis required for effectiveness. International action is not a substitute for internal action by the grievance group itself.”

Nonviolent movements can obtain a measure of protection with international solidarity, provided through reporting on their plight, and a range of tools that include economic and political sanctions by both civil society and other nation states. Human rights abusers, and outlaw regimes that murder their own people view these instruments with concern, and have managed through coordination with each other to reshape international institutions to undermine human rights. Lamentably, Ms. Alena Douhan is assisting these repressive regimes while undermining the legitimacy of nonviolent tactics to challenge them on the international level.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Our Media Echo Chamber

the AZEL

PERSPECTIVE

Commentary on Cuba's Future, U.S. Foreign Policy & Individual Freedoms - Issue 436 B
 
José Azel's latest books "On Freedom" and "Sobre La Libertad" are now available on Amazon. 
Our Media Echo Chamber (Previously published)
ShareShare
TweetTweet
ForwardForward
In news media, an echo chamber defines a situation in which information, ideas, or beliefs are amplified or reinforced by repetition inside a defined system such as newscasts, editorials, opinion pages, or online forums.  In a media echo chamber, competing points of view are disallowed or underrepresented. Echo chambers work to reinforce a given world view making it seem more predominant.
This is what we find in regimes with government controlled media. A quick glance at Cuba’s official newspaper Granma illustrates the point. Our American variety of political echo chambers is more subtle but just as effective, particularly in the online world. In the online environment, which many young people use as their only source of political information, unsubstantiated, exaggerated, or distorted claims are made and repeated by like-minded people until most assume that the claim must be true.  
 
The problem is not restricted to the online world. Mainstream media also reinforces the beliefs of their audiences by echoing back to viewers and readers arguments lacking in logical soundness. Philosophers call these flawed argumentations informal fallacies. The list of informal fallacies is extensive, but let’s see if you can spot any of these in recent media political coverage.
 
A favorite is the onus probandi fallacy in which commentators shift the burden of proof from the person making the claim to the person denying it. The burden of proof is always with the person making a claim. We should not have the burden of having to disproof others.
 
In 1952, philosopher Bertrand Russell, in an article titled “Is There a God?” made this point by introducing his “celestial teapot” example. The article, never published because it was deemed too controversial, noted that: If we assert, without offering proof, that a teapot orbits the Sun, the assertion can not be disproven. But, that those not mean it is true. There is no burden to show that no teapot is orbiting the sun. 
 
Another favorite is the slippery slope argument. This is a consequentialist argument in which it is claimed that a relatively small first step inevitably leads to a chain of events culminating in some significant undesirable event. A slippery slope argument can be valid if evidence is offered to substantiate that the initial action will result in the predicted consequences.  But, as usually offered, the presenter ignores other possibilities.
 
Pundits are also fond of the “correlation proves causation” fallacy where they offer that a correlation between two events means that one is the cause of the other. It is known that there is a strong correlation between ice-cream sales and homicide rates. Therefore, rising ice-cream sales cause homicide rates to increase; of course not. The correlation is real, but the events are unrelated, both patterns are caused by hot summer temperatures that boost ice-cream sales and homicide rates.   
 
Some commentators favor “arguments from incredulity” where they simply posit that “I cannot imagine how this could be true; therefore it must be false.” Others prefer “appeal to the stone” (argumentum ad lapidem) where they simply dismiss a claim as absurd without demonstrating its absurdity. And many “beg the question,” concluding something by assuming it.
 
Yet others continuously move the goalpost dismissing evidence presented in response to a claim and demanding other evidence. Or, engage in the “Nirvana” fallacy rejecting solutions to problems because they are not perfect. Some commentators are skilled in ignoratio elenchi, offering arguments that are valid, but totally irrelevant to their conclusions.
We should be particularly careful of the “false dilemma” fallacy where two alternatives are offered as the only possible options; often there are other options. Also, look out for the “argumentum ad temperatiam” that claims that a compromise between two positions is always correct. And when all else fails, there is the ad hominem fallacy of attacking the arguer instead of the argument. 
 
I could go on, but the point is that we must hold media commentators to a much higher standard.  If we do not, we end up with an inadvertent political echo chamber not unlike that the intentional echo chamber of authoritarian regimes.


Please let us know if you Like Issue 436 B - Our Media Echo Chamber on Facebook this article.
We welcome your feedback.
Abrazos,

Lily & José

(click on the name to email Lily or Jose)
José Azel, Ph.D.

José Azel left Cuba in 1961 as a 13 year-old political exile in what has been dubbed Operation Pedro Pan - the largest unaccompanied child refugee movement in the history of the Western Hemisphere.  

He is currently dedicated to the in-depth analyses of Cuba's economic, social and political state, with a keen interest in post-Castro-Cuba strategies. Dr. Azel was a Senior Scholar at the Institute for Cuban and Cuban-American Studies (ICCAS) at the University of Miami, Jose Azel has published extensively on Cuba related topics.

In 2012 and 2015, Dr. Azel testified in the U.S. Congress on U.S.-Cuba Policy, and U.S. National Security.  He is a frequent speaker and commentator on these and related topics on local, national and international media.  He holds undergraduate and masters degrees in business administration and a Ph.D. in International Affairs from the University of Miami.

José along with his wife Lily are avid skiers and adventure travelers.  In recent years they have climbed Grand Teton in Wyoming, trekked Mt. Kilimanjaro in Tanzania and Machu Pichu in Peru.  They have also hiked in Tibet and in the Himalayas to Mt. Everest Base Camp.

They cycled St. James Way (
El Camino de Santiago de Compostela) and cycled alongside the Danube from Germany to Hungary and throughout southern France.  They have scuba dived in the Bay Islands off the Honduran coast and in the Galapagos Islands. Most recently, they rafted for 17 days 220 miles in the Grand Canyon. 

Their adventurers are normally dedicated to raise funds for causes that are dear to them. 

Watch Joe & Lily summit Kilimanjaro.

Books by Dr. José Azel
José Azel’s writings are touched with the wisdom of a master, and the charm of an excellent communicator. Anyone who wishes to understand why countries do, or do not, progress will find in this book the best explanations. And, from these readings emerge numerous inferences: How and why do the good intentions of leftist collectivism lead countries to hell? Why is liberty not a sub product of prosperity, but rather one of its causes?

If it was in my power, this work would be required reading for all college and university students, and I would also recommend its reading to all politicians, journalists, and policymakers. With his writings Azel accomplishes what was achieved in France by Frédéric Bastiat, and in the United States by Henry Hazlitt: Azel brings together common sense with intelligent observation, and academic substance. Stupendous,

Carlos Alberto Montaner
                                                                   BUY NOW
Los escritos de José Azel están tocados por la sabiduría de un maestro y la amenidad de un excelente comunicador. Cualquiera que desee entender por qué los países progresan, o no, encontrará en este libro las mejores explicaciones. De estas lecturas surgen numerosas inferencias: ¿Cómo y por qué las buenas intenciones del colectivismo de izquierda llevan a los países al infierno? ¿Por qué la libertad no es un subproducto de la prosperidad, sino una de sus causas?

Si estuviera en mis manos, esta obra sería de obligada lectura de todos los estudiantes universitarios, pero además, le recomendaría su lectura a todos los políticos, periodistas y policy makers. Con sus escritos Azel logra lo que Frédéric Bastiat consiguiera en Francia y Henry Hazlitt en Estados Unidos: aunar el sentido común, la observación inteligente y la enjundia académica. Estupendo.

Carlos Alberto Montaner
                                                           Compre Aqui
"Liberty for beginners is much more than what the title promises. It is eighty themes touched with the wisdom of a master, and the charm of an excellent communicator. Anyone that wishes to understand why countries do, or do not progress, will find in this book the best explanations. Stupendous"

Carlos Alberto Montaner

"Libertad para novatos es mucho más de lo que promete el título. Son ochenta temas tocados con la sabiduría de un maestro y la amenidad de un excelente comunicador. Cualquier adulto que desee saber por qué progresan o se estancan los pueblos aquí encontrará las mejores explicaciones. Estupendo."

Carlos Alberto Montaner

Compre Aqui

In Reflections on FreedomJosé Azel brings together a collection of his columns published in prestigious newspapers.  Each article reveals his heartfelt and personal awareness of the importance of freedom in our lives.  They are his reflections after nearly sixty years of living and learning as a Cuban outside Cuba. In what has become his stylistic trademark, Professor Azel brilliantly introduces complex topics in brief journalistic articles.
En Reflexiones sobre la libertad José Azel reúne una colección de sus columnas publicadas en prestigiosos periódicos. Cada artículo revela su percepción sincera y personal de la importancia de la libertad en nuestras vidas. Son sus reflexiones después de casi sesenta años viviendo y aprendiendo como cubano fuera de Cuba.  En lo que ha resultado ser característica distintiva de sus artículos, el Profesor Azel introduce con brillantez complejos temas en  breves artículos de carácter periodístico.
Mañana in Cuba is a comprehensive analysis of contemporary Cuba with an incisive perspective of the Cuban frame of mind and its relevancy for Cuba's future.
Pedazos y Vacíos is a collection of poems written in by Dr. Azel in his youth. Poems are in Spanish.
To friend, follow or email author click on the icons below:
Facebook
Twitter
Email