LET'S FIGHT BACK

LET'S FIGHT BACK
GOD BLESS AMERICA

Sunday, March 8, 2026

67 years of prisoners of conscience in communist Cuba: Where is the outrage?

67 years of prisoners of conscience in communist Cuba: Where is the outrage?

“The noblest way to avenge an insult is not to imitate he who has offended us.” – Jorge Manuel Valls Arango 1933 – 2015, a Cuban prisoner of conscience and a poet he spent 20 years and 40 days in a Cuban prison

Selection of the over 1,200 political prisoners jailed today in Cuba. [ Office of Carlos A. Gimenez ]

There is talk of change in Cuba, and since the capture of Nicolas Maduro on January 3, 2026 there is also hope that it can take place soon. Existing U.S. law outlines what real change in Cuba would look like, and it has three fundamental conditions: 1) The liberation of all political prisoners. 2) The legalization of all political parties, labor unions, and the press. 3) The scheduling of free, multiparty elections for the Cuban people. This would immediately end the U.S. economic embargo on Cuba. Former Congressman Lincoln Diaz-Balart, who passed away last year, drove this point home in July of 2021 following massive nation wide anti-government protests.

Freedom House on March 6, 2026 highlighted the cases of two Cubans, Luis Manuel Otero Alcántara and Maykel ‘Osorbo’ Castillo in their social media.

Today we recognize the courage of Luis Manuel Otero Alcántara and Maykel Castillo Pérez, who used their art to push back against the Cuban government’s restrictions on artistic freedom and expression—and were unjustly imprisoned for it. We reiterate our call for their immediate… pic.twitter.com/PPqT05FDXY

— Freedom House (@freedomhouse) March 6, 2026

There are currently identified over one thousand two hundred prisoners of conscience in Cuba. Most were jailed for taking part in nationwide protests in July 2021 demanding freedom, human rights, and an end to dictatorship. This is a partial number gathered by non-governmental organizations. Official numbers are not provided by the Cuban government.

Cuban prisoners of conscience have been a reality in Cuba since 1959. Some of them participated in the struggle against Batista, and made Fidel Castro’s rise to power possible, but there nonviolent dissent condemned them to decades imprisoned.

Huber Matos, a school teacher, declared himself in opposition to Fulgencio Batista on March 10, 1952 the day that Cuban democracy came under attack. Following the extrajudicial killing of some of his former students he joined the armed struggle and ended up being one of the leaders of the revolutionary insurrection that drove Batista from power early on New Year’s Day 1959.

 
 

Huber Matos fought against Batista. Spent 22 years jailed for nonviolent dissent with communist rule.

Less than a year later he would be on trial for his life. What was his crime? Warning Fidel Castro in several private letters, where he tendered his resignation only to have it refused, that communists were infiltrating the revolutionary government. In these letters he plainly stated:

“I did not want to become an obstacle to the revolution and I believe that if I am forced to choose between falling into line or withdrawing from the world so as not to do harm, the most honorable and revolutionary action is to leave.”

Fidel Castro made the letters public generating the crisis and denouncing the charge that communists were infiltrating the government. He ordered Camilo Cienfuegos, another popular revolutionary leader, to arrest Matos. The Castro brothers began to prepare a show trial and the execution by firing squad of Huber Matos for treason.

The revolutionary tribunal was prepared. Fidel Castro spoke to Matos promising that if he confessed to everything that he would not face any prison time and could go home. Matos refused, and as the show trial began and they tried to shut him up – he refused. He went on to speak for more that three hours and concluded his testimony stating:

“I consider myself neither a traitor nor a deserter. My conscience is clear. If the court should find me guilty, I shall accept its decision – even though I may be shot. I would consider it one more service for the revolution.”

Revolutionary officers that had been convened at the trial to chant “to the execution wall” instead, moved by his testimony, rose up and applauded Matos. Instead of the firing squad the revolutionary tribunal sentenced him to 22 years in prison in December 1959.

Huber Matos would serve every day of those 22 years suffering beatings and other tortures.

Labor union organizer Mario Chanes de Armas jailed with Castro by Batista in 1953. For his nonviolent dissent Castro jailed him for 30 years

Mario Chanes de Armasa regional leader of the Cuban Brewery Workers joined Castro’s efforts to overthrow Fulgencio Batista. Both were jailed by Batista for their anti-regime activities. Mario Chanes took part in the July 26, 1953 assault on the Moncada Barracks and was wounded. He was put on trial with the Castro brothers, and sentenced to 10 years in prison, but was pardoned with them after 22 months.

Mario Chanes trained in Mexico and returned to Cuba on the Granma yacht with the Castro brothers, and Ernesto “Che” Guevara to defeat Batista.

Chanes could have had any position in the new regime, but opted to return to his brewery job. After two years of watching Castro betray their movement, Chanes spoke out against the communist influence in the revolutionary government. Chanes was tried as a counterrevolutionary and in 1961 imprisoned for 30 years.

Over the past sixty seven years the international community has too often normalized the systemic injustices perpetrated by the Castro dictatorship. Between 1959 and 1988 no international organizations were allowed to visit prisons in Cuba. This included the International Committee of the Red Cross. This was at a time that prisons were filled with prisoners of conscience and political prisoners in Cuba.

Ricardo Bofill: human rights defender and prisoner of conscience

Independent human rights organizations in Cuba are not legally recognized by the Cuban government. The Cuban Committee for Human Rights was formally established on January 28, 1976 but did not become fully active until 1983 because State Security arrested everyone shortly after it was founded.

Seven years later, in October of 1983, in the Combinado del Este prison, several prisoners of conscience who had similar aspirations met. Paradoxically, what the regime did was to join together many of those who were already marching along similar paths, and the Cuban Committee for Human Rights eventually re-emerged where many political projects usually end. In truth, there were only seven: Ricardo BofillGustavo Arcos Bergnes (then incommunicado on the ground floor and with whom the others could only speak when they took them out to the prison yard), Elizardo Sánchez Santa Cruz (who was already in the Boniato prison, but kept in contact with the others through family members), the former director of Pabellón Cuba, Teodoro del Valle, the poet René Díaz Almeyda, the diplomat Edmigio López Castillo and Ariel Hidalgo.

In 1987 the documentary “Nobody Listened” captured the human rights reality in Cuba with interviews with former political prisoners, archival footage of firing squads and other instances of repression. Former prisoners described show trials, extajudicial executions, and cruel and unusual punishment that rose to the level of torture. This in an environment were the international community was not listening.

Featured in the documentary was Jorge Valls Arango, poet, author, human rights defender, and lay Catholic.

Jorge Valls fought against tyranny and barbarism his whole life and in Cuba that meant challenging the dictatorships of Fulgencio Batista and Fidel Castro.

He suffered prison and exile during the Batista regime.

During the Castro regime he was arrested in 1964 and sentenced to 20 years in prison for testifying in defense of a friend who was being subjected to a show trial.

In the 1987 documentary Nobody Listened. Janet Maslin of The New York Times in 1988 reviewed this film and highlighted the formerly imprisoned poet.

Jorge Valls, a writer, on the other hand, points out that at least ‘’free thinking dwelt behind prison walls; it was truly the free territory of Cuba.’‘ As for public free expression at the time of the revolution, Mr. Valls says: ‘’None of that in 1959! Just extraordinary exaltation, fanatical idolatry of the victorious warrior, and rampant folly that made everything acceptable.’‘

Jorge in this documentary on the human rights situation in Cuba in the first three decades of the Castro dictatorship gives a powerful testimony in defense of freedom of expression and human dignity that remains relevant toda

Poet, former prisoner of conscience Jorge Valls

However things were about to change on the international front.

The Cuban Committee for Human Rights was able to document human rights abuses and smuggle these reports out of the prisons and out of Cuba reaching the international community. It was their work combined with the diplomatic pressure of the Reagan Administration that on March 8, 1988 the Cuban government was finally called to account for systematically denying access to Cuba’s prisons.

On March 11, 1988 Havana invited the United Nations Human Rights Commission to investigate human rights in Cuba. Over the course of the next year not only the UN Human Rights Commission, but also the International Committee of the Red Cross, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch were able to enter Cuba and document the human rights violations in the island.

This was the first and last time these organizations were allowed into Cuba to visit Castro’s prisons. The lack of outrage turned into a permanent acceptance of injustice in Cuba.

Thirty seven years have passed since the last time the International Committee of the Red Cross was able to visit Cuban prisons. Meanwhile the International Committee of the Red Cross has visited the U.S. Guantanamo detention facility over 100 times since 2001.

During the Cuban Black Spring in 2003 over a 100 activists were arrested and 75 of them were subjected to political show trials and condemned to prison terms ranging from 15 to 25 years in prison. A Czech film crew in Cuba filmed and interviewed activists before the crackdown and then interviewed their friends and family members after the show trials.

Out of this crackdown the wives, daughters, and sisters of these activists formed the Ladies in White and began organizing for their freedom. Regular marches, literary teas, and lobbying both the Cuban government and the international community. Some have been jailed, others beaten, and one of the founding leaders, Laura Inés Pollán Toledo, died under suspicious circumstances on October 14, 2011. There are still extrajudicial executions in Cuba by Castro's secret police. Oswaldo Payá Sardiñas, and Harold Cepero were murdered in a state security engineered killings on July 22, 2012, according to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in their June 9, 2023 report on the merits.

Prisoners of conscience have died in Castro's prisons while protesting mistreatment at the hands of Cuban officials. This has gone on for decades. Some of the high profile cases stretch out over more than a half century: student leader Pedro Luis Boitel (1972), human rights defender Orlando Zapata Tamayo (2010), UNPACU member Wilman Villar Mendoza (2012) and political prisoner Yosvany Arostegui Armenteros are but a few that have been well documented.

Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. issued a prophetic warning in his "Letter from Birmingham Jail" when he observed, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly.” The international community has paid a price for its acceptance of these continuing injustices. Venezuela is now suffering a human rights crisis, a product of a Cuban occupation and the imposition of these systemic injustices on a new and larger population.

From upper left to bottom right: Maykel Castillo Pérez (Maykel ‘Osorbo’), Sayli Navarro Álvarez, Loreto Hernández García, Roberto Pérez Fonseca, Félix Navarro, , Donaida Pérez Paseiro, and Luis Manuel Otero Alcántara (Amnesty International)

On January 19, 2026 Amnesty International’s regional director for the Americas urgently called for the immediate release of all Cuban prisoners of conscience, and an end to politically motivated detentions.

“The Cuban authorities have an obligation to guarantee the full and unconditional freedom of all prisoners of conscience. Sayli Navarro Álvarez, Félix Navarro, Loreto Hernández García, Donaida Pérez Paseiro, Roberto Pérez Fonseca, Maykel Castillo Pérez (Maykel ‘Osorbo’), and Luis Manuel Otero Alcántara must not spend another day in prison. The authorities must also put an end, once and for all, to detentions for political reasons,” said Ana Piquer, Amnesty International’s Regional Director for the Americas.

On April 18, 2026, Sayli Navarro Álvarez will mark four years of serving an unjust sentence in the La Bellotex prison in Matanzas, Cuba. There, she is enduring harsh living conditions, unhygienic conditions, cramped quarters, poorly prepared food, an abundance of cockroaches and mosquitoes, and a bed bug infestation.

Sayli Navarro became a Lady in White, together with her mom, over 23 years ago campaigning for her dad’s release following his arrest in March 2003 during the Black Cuban Spring. Her dad, Felix Navarro, is currently a member of the International Society for Human Rights (ISHR) board of directors. Amnesty International recognized him as a prisoner of conscience in 2003.

Both Sayli and Felix are longtime human rights defenders who have reported on systematic human rights violations in Cuba. They were detained after visiting a police station to learn more about the situation of the nonviolent demonstrators who had been imprisoned during the July 11, 2021 protests in Cuba.

Felix Navarro was arbitrarily jailed on July 12, 2021, never released, and taken to prison following a political show trial. Sayli was also detained on July 12th, but was released hours later, and had been staying with her mother, who is in poor health. She has also spoken out against her father’s arbitrary imprisonment.

On March 2, 2022 the Cuban dictatorship confirmed the prison sentences against two Cuban human rights defenders. Félix Navarro Rodríguez, ( then 68 years old), condemned to 9 years in prison. His daughter, Sayli Navarro (then 35), was condemned to eight years in prison.

Sayli was taken, with her hands and feet chained, to prison on April 18, 2022. Eleven months later, on March 18, 2023, a recording was released of her stating that state security is pressuring her to go into exile in order to be freed from prison, and that she rejected their offer.

“My husband Loreto is dying” – Donaida Perez

Black activists, and leaders of the Yoruba religion, Loreto Hernández García and Donaida Pérez Paseiro, who are prisoners of conscience detained only because of their political beliefs, and who should be immediately and unconditionally released. Loreto is not receiving adequate care in prison, and there is concern that this neglect may be fatal.

Amnesty International released an urgent action for the married couple on June 21, 2023 which contained the following text.

Cubans of all ages and walks of life have been charged, put on trial, or given harsh sentences for peacefully participating in protests in July 2021 in largely unfair and opaque proceedings mostly held behind closed doors. Among those imprisoned are spouses Donaida Pérez Paseiro, Black activist, priest, and President of the Free Yoruba Association of Cuba (“Yorubas Libres de Cuba”) and Loreto Hernández García, Black activist, priest, and Vice-President of the Free Yoruba Association of Cuba. The Yoruba religion is an African diaspora religion. They are imprisoned in Guamajal prison in Villa Clara province, central Cuba.

On 15 July 2021, police officers arrested Loreto Hernández García. His family maintains that authorities have placed him several times in solitary confinement, sometimes lasting 15 days, sometimes more. In February 2022, the Popular Municipal Court of Santa Clara (“Tribunal Municipal Popular de Santa Clara”) sentenced him to seven years in prison for “public disorder” and “contempt.” Donaida Pérez Paseiro was detained just a day after Loreto Hernández García. In February 2022, the Popular Municipal Court of Santa Clara sentenced her to eight years in prison for “public disorder”, “contempt”, and “assault” (“atentado”) against an official.

Based on the information available to Amnesty International, they should never have been charged with these offences. The organization notes that “contempt” and “public disorder” are charges frequently used in Cuba to limit the rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. The government also use other charges such as “assault” or “damages” (“daños”) when trying to unlawfully crack-down dissent. Furthermore, in connection with the charge of assault, the organization found that was no concrete and individualized allegations against Donaida.

There was a striking lack of evidence against her.

Both Black activists were tried along with 14 other protesters in an unfair trial. The judgement repeatedly refers to the protester’s political opposition to the government – something which should have no bearing in a criminal case – in a discriminatory and stigmatizing manner.

Likewise, the judgment makes it clear that the defendants’ alleged role as leaders of the anti-government protests has been considered an element of criminal responsibility.

The judges appear to have relied almost exclusively on witness statements from law enforcement officials, a common occurrence in Cuba. At the same time, the judgment dismisses all the statements by the defendants’ and by the witnesses proposed by the defence, vaguely arguing that they contradicted what the police declared.

Additionally, in Cuba, defence lawyers must belong to an official organization which, according to many sources, is closely controlled by the State. Therefore, they can only act somewhat independently when representing their clients.

Independent human rights monitors and independent media were prevented from monitoring any of the trials of the 11 July protesters. Cuban authorities have never responded to Amnesty International’s requests to monitor the trials.

According to Loreto’s family, Loreto suffers various health problems, including diabetes and hypertension, which are not being treated in prison. In May, Loreto was hospitalized without a precise diagnosis, according to reports from his family published in the media. According to his family, Loreto is in a delicate state of health due to complications from diabetes. Currently, he is in the prisoners’ wing of the Celestino Hernández Robau Provincial Hospital, known as Hospital Viejo, in Santa Clara, Cuba. The organization is concerned about allegations that he is not receiving adequate treatment.

Amnesty International considers Donaida Pérez Paseiro and Loreto Hernandez Garcia prisoners of conscience and calls for their immediate and unconditional release.

Amnesty International’s Prisoner of Conscience determination is based on the information available to Amnesty International regarding the circumstances leading to the person’s detention. In naming a person as a Prisoner of Conscience, Amnesty International is affirming that this person must be immediately and unconditionally released but is not endorsing past or present views or conduct by them

 
Roberto Pérez Fonseca
 
“Roberto Pérez Fonseca, 43, was sentenced in October 2021 to 10 years’ imprisonment for his participation in the protests of 11 July 2021. Roberto was charged with the offences of contempt, assault, public disorder and incitement to commit a crime, all of which are typically used by the Cuban authorities against those who exercise their right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association. The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found Roberto’s detention to be arbitrary and motivated by the peaceful exercise of his right to freedom of assembly and association, as well as to freedom of opinion and expression. It also found that Roberto’s right to a fair and impartial trial had been violated.” Source: Amnesty International, October 23, 2024
 
Health issues, and lack of care

Military confiscated syringes that his mother was able to obtain so that Roberto Pérez Fonseca could receive intravenous Omeprazole during his stomach ulcer crises. His health is in a precarious state due to the multiple punishments in solitary confinement, a recent episode occurred around mid July 2024, and his increasingly frequent asthma and stomach crises. Source: Albert Fonseca over X on August 22, 2024

Luis Manuel Otero Alcántara and Maykel Castillo Pérez “Osorbo”.

Luis Manuel Otero Alcántara is a visual artist. He was last arrested, and detained on July 11, 2021 before he could join in the 11J protests mentioned above. In 2021, Time Magazine recognized Luis Manuel as one of the 100 most influential people.

Maykel Castillo Pérez “Osorbo” is a rap singer and he has been in pre-trial detention for over a year. He was taken by the political police on May 18, 2021. He is also a two-time Latin Grammy winner for the song he co-wrote and performed with other Cuban artists in 2021 called Patria y Vida.

They are both members of the  San Isidro Movement, an artists collective, that defended artistic freedom.

“Castillo’s last statement to the judge during the trial was, ‘Espero que la sentencia de usted, señora jueza, sea la de su conciencia,’ which translates to: ‘I hope your sentence, madame judge, is one dictated by your conscience.,” reported NBC News.

On May 17, 2022 Luis Manuel delivered a message from prison. “In an audio recording from his prison cell at Guanajay on May 17, Otero Alcántara said: ‘I dream that no Cuban will be the enemy of any other Cuban. Today for these dreams I am ready to sacrifice the artist’s flesh, my artist’s flesh, and my freedom-loving spirit,’” reported PEN International.

Luis Manuel was sentenced to five years and Maykel Castillo to nine years in prison on a range of charges related to their participation in a peaceful demonstration and an artistic performance, and their criticism of President Miguel Díaz-Canel”, reported Amnesty International.

Reuters reported at the time that “the U.S. Embassy in Havana on [June 1, 2022] criticized the trial of two Cuban artist-dissidents as neither ‘free nor fair’ on social media, fueling a growing standoff over human rights just weeks after Washington moved to ease sanctions on the island nation.”

However, one need not rely on U.S. diplomats on the reality that trials in Cuba are neither “free nor fair.” The president of the Supreme People’s Court (TSP), Rubén Remigio Ferro, dispelled them in a video revealed by DIARIO DE CUBA entitled “How Justice Is Decided in Cuba” that demonstrates that the judiciary is subordinate to the Cuban Communist Party, the Council of State, and works with the secret police, and prosecutors office to ensure that acquittals are kept at a minimum.

This was a political trial and a mockery of justice.

People of good will are not remaining passive before this injustice. Protests have been carried out in Miami, Madrid, New York and elsewhere to demonstrate solidarity with both Luis Manuel and Maykel.

They all remain in unjustly imprisoned today.

Please amplify their names, their plight, and join in the demand for their freedom. Let us also remind policy makers in the world's democracies and in the Cuban dictatorship that freeing all political prisoners is one of the three conditions for lifting U.S. sanctions on Havana.

 
 
 

Monday, March 2, 2026

Cuba’s humanitarian crisis

Cuba’s humanitarian crisis. Brothers to the Rescue shoot down at 30. The call to indict Raul Castro. Observing Cuban martyr’s birth anniversary.

“There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest”. – Elie Wiesel

A bench with Oswaldo José Payá Sardiñas’s name inscribed was unveiled and blessed on the Malecón of Our Lady of Charity.

Cuba’s humanitarian crisis, the birth anniversary of Oswaldo José Payá Sardiñas and the 30 year anniversary of the Brothers to the Rescue shoot down observed, and calls to indict Raul Castro for ordering the shoot down that killed four humanitarians dominated the news this past week.

Oswaldo José Payá Sardiñas was born 74 years ago on February 29, 1952.  A bench with his name inscribed was blessed on the Malecón of Our Lady of Charity ( La Ermita) , dedicated to his memory. Ambassador Mike Hammer and the Payá family attended and spoke at its unveiling.

 

This was followed at 4:00 PM with a memorial mass offering our prayers for all those who have died for the freedom of Cuba and for the political prisoners who suffer on the island today. During the homily, Father José Espino read an excerpt from The Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 43 – 48) and a reflection on Christian nonviolence and the nature of authentic freedom.

Love of Enemies.*

43b “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’c
44 But I say to you, love your enemies, and pray for those who persecute you,
45  that you may be children of your heavenly Father, for he makes his sun rise on the bad and the good, and causes rain to fall on the just and the unjust.
46 For if you love those who love you, what recompense will you have? Do not the tax collectors* do the same?
47 And if you greet your brothers only, what is unusual about that? Do not the pagans do the same?*
48 So be perfect,* just as your heavenly Father is perfect.d

Yale professor and author Carlos Eire published the OpEd in The Washington Post titled “What it’s like to watch a dictatorship strangle your home country” on February 26th which focuses on the humanitarian crisis, and the prospects of a democratic transition in light of the aftermath of the January 3, 2026 rendition of Nicolas Maduro, and newly applied pressure by the United States on Cuba. On the same day the Center for a Free Cuba’s executive director, together with other Cuban human rights defenders, testified before the Canadian parliament in a hearing on Cuba’s humanitarian crisis. Below is an excerpt from the hearing.

 

On February 25, 2026 the Cuban dictatorship announced that a shoot out had taken place with Cuban exiles. CFC’s executive director interviewed by NTD News a day later, warned that Havana was not a reliable narrator, and that an independent investigation needed to be conducted to establish what had happened. He also pointed out that Cubans were killed on October 28, 2022 when a boat carrying refugees was ambushed and sunk north of Bahia Honda by a Cuban coast guard cutter. Mother of a child killed in the attack was arrested after exposing Havana’s false narrative.

On the 30th anniversary of the February 24, 1996 Brothers to the Rescue shoot down, the Center for a Free Cuba’s executive director had an opinion piece published in The Washington Times that made the case that the Helms-Burton act that was signed into law in March of 1996 in retaliation for Havana’s act of state terrorism lays out the path to a democratic transition in Cuba.

Family members of the four men killed organized a vigil at Florida International University on February 24, 2026. Members of Brothers to the Rescue held a vigil at Opa Locka airport at a memorial for the four members killed. All called for the United States to indict Raul Castro for ordering the murder of Carlos Costa, Pablo Morales, Mario De La Peña, and Armando Alejandre Jr.

The Center also organized a silent vigil at the Cuban Embassy on February 23, 2026 remembering Cuban dissident Orlando Zapata Tamayo, who died on February 23, 2010, following a prolonged hunger strike, in which prison officials denied him water contributing to his death, and remembering Carlos Costa, Pablo Morales, Mario De La Peña, and Armando Alejandre murdered on Raul Castro’s orders on February 24, 1996.  During the hour long vigil fact sheets were distributed on what had been done to Orlando Zapata Tamayo, and on the Brothers to the Rescue shoot down.

Monday, February 23, 2026

The Narcissism of Small Differences in Cuba’s History

the AZEL

PERSPECTIVE

Commentary on Cuba's Future, U.S. Foreign Policy & Individual Freedoms - Issue 449 B
 
José Azel's latest books "On Freedom" and "Sobre La Libertad" are now available on Amazon.

The Narcissism of Small Differences in Cuba’s History (Previously published)

ShareShare
TweetTweet
ForwardForward

A man was standing on a cliff about to jump when another man yelled: Stop, don’t do it! 
Jumper: Why shouldn’t I?
Second man: Because there is so much to live for!
Jumper: Like what?
Second man: Are you religious?
Jumper: Yes
Second man: Me too. Are you Christian of Buddhist?
Jumper: Christian.
Second man: Me too. Are you Catholic or Protestant?
Jumper: Protestant.
Second man: Me too. Are you Episcopalian or Baptist?
Jumper: Baptist.
Second man: Great. Are you original Baptist Church of God or are you Reformed Baptist Church of God? Jumper: Reformed Baptist Church of God
Second man: Me too. Are you reformation of 1879, or reformation of 1915?
Jumper: Reformation of 1915.
Second man, while angrily pushing jumper off the cliff: Die, you heretic scum!

I came across this witticism while researching Sigmund Freud’s theory of the “Narcissism of small differences.” In his thesis, Freud argues that “It is precisely the minor differences in people who are otherwise alike that form the basis of feelings of hostility between them.” He called this phenomenon the narcissism of small differences.

In political science, the narcissism of small differences offers on explanation as to why communities with similar ethnic, linguistic, and cultural backgrounds, and often in adjoining territories, tend to engage in feuds. In many cases of ethno-nationalist conflict, the deepest hatred is shown by communities that, by most appearances, exhibit very few significant distinctions.

For instance, the violence in Kyrgyzstan between the Uzbek and Kyrgyz populations, the toxic confrontations in the Punjab, Northern Ireland, Cyprus, Sri Lanka, and in Belgium between French and Flemish-speaking Belgians; the cruelty of the Balkan Wars, the Hutu and Tutsi viciousness in Rwanda and Burundi, the Iranian Shiite-Sunni conflict, and many more. Of course, once a conflict begins, other differences and topics act as multipliers for the hostility.

With his narcissism of small differences, Freud gave us an analytical framework, but not much more of a causal explanation. It has been suggested that the distress is narcissistic in nature because it is as if we are looking at ourselves in a mirror.

I have come to think of the narcissism of small differences when contemplating schisms in opposition movements, particularly in Cuba’s history from the wars for independence of the 19th Century to the last six decades of opposition to the Castro regime. Some episodes, such as the shameful abandonment of Cuban patriot Carlos Manuel de Céspedes by his compatriots, had tragic consequences. Céspedes, who in 1868 freed his slaves and launched Cuba’s Ten Years’ War, was later deposed in a leadership coup. The new Cuban government would not let him go into exile and denied him an escort. Left unprotected, Spanish troops killed him in 1874.

Cuban opposition to the Castro regime, since its origins in 1959, has been fragmented, made up of myriad groups lacking in operational unity. Often the schisms had political or philosophical underpinnings, but also resulted from tactical differences, revanchism, and personal ambitions for protagonism. This disunity perseveres to this day, often initiated or exploited by Cuba’s ever-present counterintelligence services. But these are all Cuban nationals that tragically fight each other viciously, notwithstanding an overriding common objective of opposition to communist ideology. Is this a manifestation of the narcissism of small differences?

Understandably, opposition groups cannot aspire to agree on the whole of their diverging political- economic programs. But, as was the case with the Founding Fathers, it is necessary to work together with those who may have different political ideas but who are willing to unite over specific issues and rights.

Rather than a criticism, Freud’s narcissism of small differences offers opposition groups a template for constructive introspection.

Please let us know if you Like Issue 449 B - The Narcissism of Small Differences in Cuba’s History on Facebook this article.
We welcome your feedback.
Abrazos,

Lily & José

(click on the name to email Lily or Jose)
José Azel, Ph.D.

José Azel left Cuba in 1961 as a 13 year-old political exile in what has been dubbed Operation Pedro Pan - the largest unaccompanied child refugee movement in the history of the Western Hemisphere.  

He is currently dedicated to the in-depth analyses of Cuba's economic, social and political state, with a keen interest in post-Castro-Cuba strategies. Dr. Azel was a Senior Scholar at the Institute for Cuban and Cuban-American Studies (ICCAS) at the University of Miami, Jose Azel has published extensively on Cuba related topics.

In 2012 and 2015, Dr. Azel testified in the U.S. Congress on U.S.-Cuba Policy, and U.S. National Security.  He is a frequent speaker and commentator on these and related topics on local, national and international media.  He holds undergraduate and masters degrees in business administration and a Ph.D. in International Affairs from the University of Miami.

José along with his wife Lily are avid skiers and adventure travelers.  In recent years they have climbed Grand Teton in Wyoming, trekked Mt. Kilimanjaro in Tanzania and Machu Pichu in Peru.  They have also hiked in Tibet and in the Himalayas to Mt. Everest Base Camp.

They cycled St. James Way (
El Camino de Santiago de Compostela) and cycled alongside the Danube from Germany to Hungary and throughout southern France.  They have scuba dived in the Bay Islands off the Honduran coast and in the Galapagos Islands. Most recently, they rafted for 17 days 220 miles in the Grand Canyon.

Their adventurers are normally dedicated to raise funds for causes that are dear to them. 

Watch Joe & Lily summit Kilimanjaro.

Books by Dr. José Azel
José Azel’s writings are touched with the wisdom of a master, and the charm of an excellent communicator. Anyone who wishes to understand why countries do, or do not, progress will find in this book the best explanations. And, from these readings emerge numerous inferences: How and why do the good intentions of leftist collectivism lead countries to hell? Why is liberty not a sub product of prosperity, but rather one of its causes?

If it was in my power, this work would be required reading for all college and university students, and I would also recommend its reading to all politicians, journalists, and policymakers. With his writings Azel accomplishes what was achieved in France by Frédéric Bastiat, and in the United States by Henry Hazlitt: Azel brings together common sense with intelligent observation, and academic substance. Stupendous,

Carlos Alberto Montaner
                                                                   BUY NOW
Los escritos de José Azel están tocados por la sabiduría de un maestro y la amenidad de un excelente comunicador. Cualquiera que desee entender por qué los países progresan, o no, encontrará en este libro las mejores explicaciones. De estas lecturas surgen numerosas inferencias: ¿Cómo y por qué las buenas intenciones del colectivismo de izquierda llevan a los países al infierno? ¿Por qué la libertad no es un subproducto de la prosperidad, sino una de sus causas?

Si estuviera en mis manos, esta obra sería de obligada lectura de todos los estudiantes universitarios, pero además, le recomendaría su lectura a todos los políticos, periodistas y policy makers. Con sus escritos Azel logra lo que Frédéric Bastiat consiguiera en Francia y Henry Hazlitt en Estados Unidos: aunar el sentido común, la observación inteligente y la enjundia académica. Estupendo.

Carlos Alberto Montaner
                                                           Compre Aqui
"Liberty for beginners is much more than what the title promises. It is eighty themes touched with the wisdom of a master, and the charm of an excellent communicator. Anyone that wishes to understand why countries do, or do not progress, will find in this book the best explanations. Stupendous"

Carlos Alberto Montaner

"Libertad para novatos es mucho más de lo que promete el título. Son ochenta temas tocados con la sabiduría de un maestro y la amenidad de un excelente comunicador. Cualquier adulto que desee saber por qué progresan o se estancan los pueblos aquí encontrará las mejores explicaciones. Estupendo."

Carlos Alberto Montaner

Compre Aqui

In Reflections on FreedomJosé Azel brings together a collection of his columns published in prestigious newspapers.  Each article reveals his heartfelt and personal awareness of the importance of freedom in our lives.  They are his reflections after nearly sixty years of living and learning as a Cuban outside Cuba. In what has become his stylistic trademark, Professor Azel brilliantly introduces complex topics in brief journalistic articles.
En Reflexiones sobre la libertad José Azel reúne una colección de sus columnas publicadas en prestigiosos periódicos. Cada artículo revela su percepción sincera y personal de la importancia de la libertad en nuestras vidas. Son sus reflexiones después de casi sesenta años viviendo y aprendiendo como cubano fuera de Cuba.  En lo que ha resultado ser característica distintiva de sus artículos, el Profesor Azel introduce con brillantez complejos temas en  breves artículos de carácter periodístico.
Mañana in Cuba is a comprehensive analysis of contemporary Cuba with an incisive perspective of the Cuban frame of mind and its relevancy for Cuba's future.
Pedazos y Vacíos is a collection of poems written in by Dr. Azel in his youth. Poems are in Spanish.