LET'S FIGHT BACK
GOD BLESS AMERICA
Friday, January 31, 2020
“He Will Not Be Acquitted”
Pelosi Melts Down As Impeachment Implodes, Says If Senate Votes To Acquit President Trump “He Will Not Be Acquitted” (Video)
(Gateway Pundit) – House Speaker Nancy Pelosi went on an insane rant Thursday as impeachment imploded in the senate.
President Trump’s defense team absolutely destroyed Schiff and the Dems, causing Pelosi to have a meltdown during a press conference.
A reporter asked Pelosi if Trump will be “chastened” knowing “congress is watching him” or “emboldened” if the senate acquits him.
“Well he will not be acquitted. You cannot be acquitted if you don’t have a trial and when you don’t have a trial if you don’t have witnesses and documentation,” Pelosi said.
WATCH:
573 people are talking about this
.@SpeakerPelosi: If the Senate votes to aquit Pres. Trump, he “will not be acquitted”
This old lady is just completely nuts. They had an unfair trial in the House, didn't allow the president any witnesses, interviewed their "witnesses" behind closed doors, & didn't even vote to impeach! It was an inquiry only! This D'Rats cannot help themselves they are evil!
See Rene Casanova's other Tweets
.@SpeakerPelosi: If the Senate votes to aquit Pres. Trump, he “will not be acquitted”
Its basically a sit-com at this point, they might as well have some playing a laugh track everytime this woman speaks.
See The Rambler's other Tweets
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has the votes to block new witnesses and the impeachment trial should be over by the weekend, according to ABC News.
Tyrant Pelosi tried to drag out impeachment as long as possible by refusing to deliver the articles of impeachment to the senate for 33 days.
The House Democrats’ case was so weak that Trump’s defense team obliterated Schiff and Pelosi in just a few days with facts.
thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/pelosi-melts-down-as-impeachment-implodes-says-if-senate-votes-to-acquit-president-trump-he-will-not-be-acquitted-video/
Rand Releases Question
Rand Paul Releases Impeachment Trial Question Censored By John Roberts
(Gateway Pundit) – Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has released the question that was blocked Wednesday and Thursday by Chief Justice John Roberts in the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump. Paul’s question deals with the origins of the impeachment inquiry and employs the name of the alleged whistleblower, not in that context but with regard to his relation with a NSC co-worker who moved on to the staff of Lead House Manager Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and whether they plotted to impeach Trump before the House impeachment proceedings started.
The question and answer sessions of the impeachment trial involve senators submitting written questions to Roberts who then reads them aloud for the House Managers and/or the President’s legal team to answer.
Paul tried to have the question asked on Wednesday, but Roberts had reportedly informed the Senate he would not ask questions that mentioned the name of the alleged whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, prompting the GOP leadership to not allow the question to be submitted to Roberts. Paul could be heard from the gallery arguing about the cesnsoring of his question. He later said he would fight to get his question asked and succeeded on Thursday, speaking to Roberts that he was submitting the question. After the card with the question was delivered by a page to Roberts, Roberts read the question silently then announced, “The presiding officer declines to read the question as submitted.”
NEW: "The presiding officer declines to read the question as submitted," Chief Justice John Roberts said after Sen. Rand Paul submitted a question.
Paul left the chamber after Roberts declined to read his question. abcn.ws/38SUHds
269 people are talking about this
Paul’s statement and the censored question:
My question today is about whether or not individuals who were holdovers from the Obama National Security Council and Democrat partisans conspired with Schiff staffers to plot impeaching the President before there were formal House impeachment proceedings.My exact question was:“Are you aware that House intelligence committee staffer Shawn Misko had a close relationship with Eric Ciaramella while at the National Security Council together and are you aware and how do you respond to reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the President before there were formal house impeachment proceedings.”My question is not about a “whistleblower” as I have no independent information on his identity. My question is about the actions of known Obama partisans within the NSC and House staff and how they are reported to have conspired before impeachment proceedings had even begun.
My question today is about whether or not individuals who were holdovers from the Obama National Security Council and Democrat partisans conspired with Schiff staffers to plot impeaching the President before there were formal House impeachment proceedings.
56.3K people are talking about this
My exact question was:
Are you aware that House intelligence committee staffer Shawn Misko had a close relationship with Eric Ciaramella while at the National Security Council together 1/2
19.4K people are talking about this
My exact question was:
Are you aware that House intelligence committee staffer Shawn Misko had a close relationship with Eric Ciaramella while at the National Security Council together 1/2
and are you aware and how do you respond to reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the President before there were formal house impeachment proceedings. 2/2
18.8K people are talking about this
and are you aware and how do you respond to reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the President before there were formal house impeachment proceedings. 2/2
My question is not about a “whistleblower” as I have no independent information on his identity. My question is about the actions of known Obama partisans within the NSC and House staff and how they are reported to have conspired before impeachment proceedings had even begun.
25.4K people are talking about this
Note: There is no legal requirement for the name of the alleged whistleblower to be kept secret, except by the Intelligence Community Inspector General to whom he reported Trump’s alleged Ukraine issues.
thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/rand-paul-releases-impeachment-trial-question-censored-by-john-roberts/
Featured image credit: Gage Skidmore – flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/13008007785
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)