In short, we empathize more with people who are “like us” than with “them.” We are not alone in this divide; psychologists have shown that a mouse seeing another in pain, is more likely to mimic the hurting if it knows the other mouse. And Capuchin monkeys will help out another monkey only if they are in a friendly relationship. Keep this empathy gap and the Us-Them divide in mind as we explore the complex topic of justice.
In his book The Idea of Justice, Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen offers a simple example to begin the discussion. Imagine a scenario where three children, Anne, Bob, and Carla quarrel over a flute. Carla built the flute, and she claims the flute is hers because it is the product of her labor. Not so, says Anne, who claims the flute should be hers because she is the only one of the three that can play the flute. Yet, Bob claims the flute should be given to him because he is so poor that he has no other toys, and the flute would give him something to play with. How would you decide between these three claims?
It turns out that who gets the flute derives from your philosophy of justice. Egalitarians would argue vehemently, on economic grounds, that Bob should get the flute because he is the poorest and neediest of the three. Egalitarians would take the flute from Carla and give it to Bob since he has no toys to play with.
In contrast, utilitarians would argue, just as forcefully, that the flute should be given to Anne. From the utilitarian philosophy of greatest pleasure to the greatest number, Anne would derive the greatest pleasure as she is the only one that can actually play the flute.
Finally, libertarians would insist that Carla’s labor produced the flute and therefore it is hers.
In other words, for egalitarians it is a question of addressing Bob’s poverty; for utilitarians the subject matter is human fulfillment, as addressed by Anne’s playing the flute. And for libertarians the essential point is the right to enjoy the product of one’s labor. All three positions are based on rational arguments within their own perspective of justice. Yet, each position leads to a different resolution that exacerbates the Us-Them divide where the tears of strangers are only water.
No comments:
Post a Comment