Counter-Enlightenment philosophers replaced individual rights with the “general will” of the collective. The nationalistic glorification of the nation-state that accompanies collectivism fueled hostility among nations paving the way for two World Wars. These, in turn, were followed by the spread of totalitarian communist dictatorships throughout the world.
In the United States, as argued by Michael Dahlen in The Roots of Capitalism and Stalinism in the West, the Counter-Enlightenment ideas “have undermined the commitments of Americans to the nation’s founding principles of individual rights and limited government.”
Prominent American Leftists groveled over the Soviet Union’s central planning; fawned over the socialist experiments in Cuba, China, and North Vietnam, and idolized murderous tyrants like Mao Tse-tung, Fidel Castro, and Che Guevara. As the Counter-Enlightenment ideas infiltrated American culture, the role of government expanded taking from our treasure and our individual rights.
In the early 21st century, American political culture finds itself in a rather confused philosophical state of affairs. Today’s versions of the philosophical ideas of the Enlightenment and Counter-Enlightenment are the globalization and counter- globalization movements.
Globalization, purportedly a business-friendly movement, favors easier movement of goods, capital, and people across national borders. Conceptually, globalization reduces the importance of borders and of nation-states.
Counter-globalization, on the other hand, is an anti-business, anti-consumerism idea opposed to the integration of markets and carrying great antipathy to multi- national corporations. Conceptually, counter-globalization increases the importance of nation-states.
No comments:
Post a Comment