BY: EDUARDO E. RODRIGUEZ OCPI
COMMUNICATOR FOR THE ORGANIZATION OF COMMUNICATORS AND INDEPENDENT JOURNALIST OF PUERTO RICO
On an article written on February 28, 2015, by Nahum Barnes and Shimon Shiffer, they allege that Israel prime minister is responsible for a "Strategic damage on Iran." Why?
Netanyahu is an honorable and brave man, his military history is proof of that. These accusations are without any basis whatsoever, in times when we are dealing with a sect, supported by Obama, who has also proven to be a muslim fanatic, which decapitates the innocent, burns them, crucifies them or buries them alive. But the only argument all liberals can make, is to attack Bibi for the evils that only islam has created; as the first criminal organization in history, led by a false prophet, a mass murderer and rapist, Mohammed.
But not only does he has to deal with this evil anachronistic islamic ideology, but then he also has to deal with an american president who rejects his founded warnings, even though they are based on chronological historical facts.
Israel's leader has tried, with every effort possible to stop the threat imposed upon them, not only by Iran, but by the majority of the islamic states surrounding them, using, which seems in vain, all the diplomacy he can muster up without losing the patience of a true tactful politician, while the islamic foe is conspiring to diminish those efforts, threatening to envelop us in a nuclear holocaust, by continuing the enrichment of the atom. A country which is engulfed in a rich sea of black gold and has no need of nuclear energy, unless it be for the obliteration of all non islamic nations.
COMMUNICATOR FOR THE ORGANIZATION OF COMMUNICATORS AND INDEPENDENT JOURNALIST OF PUERTO RICO
On an article written on February 28, 2015, by Nahum Barnes and Shimon Shiffer, they allege that Israel prime minister is responsible for a "Strategic damage on Iran." Why?
But not only does he has to deal with this evil anachronistic islamic ideology, but then he also has to deal with an american president who rejects his founded warnings, even though they are based on chronological historical facts.
Israel's leader has tried, with every effort possible to stop the threat imposed upon them, not only by Iran, but by the majority of the islamic states surrounding them, using, which seems in vain, all the diplomacy he can muster up without losing the patience of a true tactful politician, while the islamic foe is conspiring to diminish those efforts, threatening to envelop us in a nuclear holocaust, by continuing the enrichment of the atom. A country which is engulfed in a rich sea of black gold and has no need of nuclear energy, unless it be for the obliteration of all non islamic nations.
No comments:
Post a Comment