WHILE intelligence/security agencies have a “habit” of implanting agent provocateurs to effectuate a regime’s political objectives, the fact of the matter is that Obama Inc. tips the scale. As the leadership of the free world, their actions are akin to third world juntas or communist regimes. Pick your poison. Wait and see.
NOW, just to give readers a taste of this investigative journalist’s familiarity with the related subject matter, some may want to peer within. When done, ask yourselves: how did such info (contained in the link, plus so much more still hidden from public view) drop into said lap?
MOVING right along….this site hammered home, on a multiplicity of occasions, four related and intersecting themes: (1) DHS has been co-opted by an anti-American leadership; (2) the militarization of local police forces are part and parcel; (3) race-wars are “necessary”, and (4) martial law is their end point. Heavy-duty charges, but no less true.
Intersection One:
AGREED, America (like the rest of the west) is facing many threats. We get that. But most rational folks also recognize that a slippery slope exists between a free and unfree society. And herein lies the crux.
THE proofs are manifest: DHS, originally conceived as an umbrella dept. to house the homeland’s security arms – both from internal and external threats – is now tasked with anti-American designs.
SPECIFICALLY, back in Dec. 2013, the following was noted: DHS, an outlaw agency, was caught ferrying illegal aliens into America. It has become a replica of AG Holder’s lawless dept of (in)justice. Hmm.
SIMILARLY, without a doubt, DHS is now Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s “standing army”; his “forward march” arm. Incontestably.
Intersection Two:
IN light of unfolding events, isn’t it clear why local police forces are increasingly militarized akin to standing armies?
AND, most alarmingly, Obama’s Pentagon is fully in the mix, as one of its procurement programs clearly demonstrates the close nexus. After all, why would equipment, once utilized by U.S. fighting forces, fit the “needs” of local police forces? A fair question, you think?
Intersection Three:
BACK in Sept. 2013, this site claimed: a DHS (Black) employee was charged with procuring heavy-duty weaponry and caught (online) inciting a race war! The employee, instead of being arrested, was placed on PAID leave. Okay.
AND shock of all shocks…not exactly…the recent execution of two NYPD officers mirrored race-baiting to its maximum effect! Readers, have no doubt about this direct intersection.
Intersection Four:
YET, as to the fourth intersecting factor, their end point, martial law: when retired army officers warn about martial law, what more needs to be added? Not only that, but DHS is really Valerie Jarrett’s fiefdom. Yes, her playground.
IN this regard, even if DHS’s “leaker” hadn’t spilled the beans, what other rational conclusion(s) would fit the (actual) facts on the ground? Besides, aren’t the above proofs (plus others housed within this blog) spot on?
YOU decide.
DHS Is Fanning the Flames of Violence
In the past five days I have been contacted, via one of my most trusted sources, a member of DHS who is opposed to the events and DHS involvement in Ferguson, Missouri. This source stated that DHS is running the Ferguson Police Department and their actions are designed to antagonize and to provoke the locals to violence. He further stated that he believed that the ultimate goal is to inflame the local citizens to such a point martial law will be declared.
In even a more shocking revelation, this DHS source stated that the rioting and looting which followed the shooting death of 18 year old, Michael Brown, was encouraged and exacerbated by undercover DHS agents posing as members of the Black Panthers.
Lending support to this latest accusation of DHS complicity in the rioting was the behavior of the Ferguson Police Department during the looting. During the civil unrest, the behavior of the Ferguson Police was to simply create a perimeter around the looting and allow it to continue. This violates every tenet of law enforcement. It more resembles quarantine procedures practiced by DHS, Northcom and the National Guard. The police should have moved to intervene to stop the looting and prevent the spread of violence. If the situation was beyond the control of the police, then the National Guard should have been brought in. Given the revelation of the DHS source, it seems plausible that his story of wanting the violence to escalate appears to be the case.
The Ferguson Police Deliberately Antagonizes the Media for Doing Their Job
Both Ryan Reilly, of the Huffington Post, and Washington Post reporter, Wesley Lowery, were working in a McDonald’s in Ferguson, Missouri, when a SWAT team suddenly descended upon the restaurant. After being told to stop recording the proceedings, and refusing, both men were then violently arrested in yet another case of Ferguson police brutality. Please note that recording police officers is a legal act.
Lowery was shoved into a soda machine. One of Ferguson’s finest slammed Ryan Reilly’s head against glass. Lowery told the police that this would be on the front page of the Washington Post tomorrow and the officer responded, “Yeah, well you will be in my jail cell tonight”.
Thomas Jackson is supposed to be the Chief of Police in Ferguson, Missouri. Thomas Jackson has largely been reduced to a figure head and is not in command of his own paramilitary police force that has been outfitted and equipped by DHS.
Jackson has so completely lost control of his own force, he expressed extreme surprise when he was told by reporter Matt Pearce that reporters Reilley and Lowery were being arrested (see tweet below).
I just called Ferguson police chief to ask about @WesleyLowery and @ryanjreilly, told him what I knew. His response: “Oh, God.”
Lowery and Reilly are not the only reporters are not the only media being harassed by the out of control paramilitary force from Ferguson. Al-Jazeera reporters were hit with tear gas canisters. Other reporters tell stories of having Ferguson Swat Teams points guns at them and threatening them.
In the following tweet, Lowery describes the police brutality of his arrest.
Officers slammed me into a fountain soda machine because I was confused about which door they were asking me to walk out of
Does the Chief know that other members of the media are being threatened for merely covering the events as reporters are mandated and permitted to do? If this “Chief” had control of his police force, he would have strict rules for dealing with the media and these rules would not consist of promoting the police brutality described below. The last thing a police chief should want is to alienate the media in hostile and controversial situation. This Chief should be arresting any provocateurs who have infiltrated his department and are giving orders. Instead, he is laying down in the face of illegitimate DHS authority which is operating in violation of the 10th Amendment. Thomas Jackson needs to immediately resign.
YES, ever since this blog site’s inception (June 2012), a rock solid case has been made against the Anti-American-in-Chief, and its charges have proven to be totally on the mark. Mind you, this is NOT a cause for celebration, for being wrong is often more comforting than being right. This is one of those times.
TO wit, whether or not revolutionary leftists/reds or Islamist/greens (within or outside the White House) carry out the national destruction – working separately or in tandem – their end point is the same. It is through this lens that patriotic Americans (similarly inclined westerners too) must assess ALL of Obama Inc.’s actual moves and verbal cues.
AS oft-stated, a foreign implant is housed within the People’s House. He is attempting to bring down America, and his tentacles are red/green aligned. These facts are provable and no longer up for debate.
THE case against Barack HUSSEIN Obama is closed. It is way past time to force Congress – whatever it takes – to hand down an indictment!
THE remaining question is: does America still belong to the People or is it currently lunging toward a “soft” dictatorship? Indeed, this is a long overdue query. The answer is either “Door A” or “Door B”. No betwixt or between.
No comments:
Post a Comment